Kokią Windows sistemą naudoja sistema, kai niekas nėra prisijungęs?

Turinys:

Kokią Windows sistemą naudoja sistema, kai niekas nėra prisijungęs?
Kokią Windows sistemą naudoja sistema, kai niekas nėra prisijungęs?
Anonim
Jei jums įdomu ir sužinokite daugiau apie tai, kaip "Windows" veikia po gaubtu, tuomet gali pasirodyti, kad įdomu žinoti, kokie "paskyros" aktyvieji procesai veikia, kai niekas nėra prisijungęs prie "Windows". Atsižvelgdami į tai, šiandieninis SuperUser Q & A įrašas turi atsakymus į įdomų skaitytoją.
Jei jums įdomu ir sužinokite daugiau apie tai, kaip "Windows" veikia po gaubtu, tuomet gali pasirodyti, kad įdomu žinoti, kokie "paskyros" aktyvieji procesai veikia, kai niekas nėra prisijungęs prie "Windows". Atsižvelgdami į tai, šiandieninis SuperUser Q & A įrašas turi atsakymus į įdomų skaitytoją.

Šiandieninė klausimų ir atsakymų sesija pateikiama su "SuperUser" - "Stack Exchange", bendruomenės valdoma Q & A grupių asociacija.

Klausimas

"SuperUser" skaitytuvas Kunal Chopra nori sužinoti, kokią sąskaitą "Windows" naudoja, kai niekas nėra prisijungęs:

When no one is logged into Windows and the log in screen is displayed, which user account are the current processes running under (video & sound drivers, login session, any server software, accessibility controls, etc.)? It cannot be any user or the previous user because no one is logged in.

What about processes that have been started by a user but continue to run after logging off (for example, HTTP/FTP servers and other networking processes)? Do they switch over to the SYSTEM account? If a user-started process is switched over to the SYSTEM account, then that indicates a very serious vulnerability. Does such a process run by that user continue to run under that user’s account somehow after they have logged off?

Is this why the SETHC hack allows you to use CMD as SYSTEM?

Kurią paskyrą naudoja Windows, kai niekas nėra prisijungęs?

Atsakymas

SuperUser autorius gravitacija turi mums atsakymą:

When no one is logged into Windows and the log in screen is displayed, which user account are the current processes running under (video & sound drivers, login session, any server software, accessibility controls, etc.)?

Almost all drivers run in kernel mode; they do not need an account unless they start user-space processes. Those user-space drivers run under SYSTEM.

With regard to the login session, I am sure that it uses SYSTEM as well. You can see logonui.exe using Process Hacker or SysInternals Process Explorer. In fact, you can see everything that way.

As for server software, see Windows services below.

What about processes that have been started by a user but continue to run after logging off (for example, HTTP/FTP servers and other networking processes)? Do they switch over to the SYSTEM account?

There are three kinds here:

  1. Plain Old Background Processes: These run under the same account as whoever started them and do not run after logging off. The logoff process kills them all. HTTP/FTP servers and other networking processes do not run as regular background processes. They run as services.
  2. Windows Service Processes: These are not launched directly, but via the Service Manager. By default, services run as LocalSystem (which isanae says equals SYSTEM) can have dedicated accounts configured. Of course, practically nobody bothers. They just install XAMPP, WampServer, or some other software and let it run as SYSTEM (forever unpatched). On recent Windows systems, I think services can also have their own SIDs, but again I have not done much research on this yet.
  3. Scheduled Tasks: These are launched by the Task Scheduler Service in the background and always run under the account configured in the task (usually whoever created the task).

If a user-started process is switched over to the SYSTEM account, then that indicates a very serious vulnerability.

It is not a vulnerability because you must already have Administrator privileges to install a service. Having Administrator privileges already lets you do practically everything.

See Also: Various other non-vulnerabilities of the same kind.

Būtinai perskaitykite likusią šios įdomios diskusijos nuorodą žemiau!

Ar turite ką nors įtraukti į paaiškinimą? Garsas išjungtas komentaruose. Norite skaityti daugiau atsakymų iš kitų "Tech-savvy Stack Exchange" vartotojų? Patikrinkite visą diskusijų temą čia.

Rekomenduojamas: